The name painted on the side was "Solace", but I've now just uncovered a previous name of "Tarka".
I've been advised that it's unlucky to alter the name of a boat. Is that true, I wonder? The change from Tarka to Solace clearly didn't seem to do it any harm (ie. it didn't sink), and so it follows that the threat of bad luck is bunkum, and that it can be re-christened with any new name of choice. And I must admit I am rather looking forward to cracking open a bottle of Moet as 'I name this boat...'. Any excuse!
Although the vessel does have this 'working title' just for fun, I am wondering if I could officially re-name it "A Boat For My Potplants" without fear of impending doom. After all, the original idea of having the boat was to use it as a garden upon which to sit and read my newspaper among my potplants, whilst slowly drinking a cool beer during the balmy summer evenings. The name would be very apt.
But is A Boat For My Potplants too much of a mouthful, as some folks have suggested?
Might the unusual name raise too many eyebrows, as others have warned?
Or should its name revert to the previous Solace? Or the original Tarka?
Or should a new name entirely be given? If so, what could it possibly be?
Any suggestions please? I'm so confused!
STOP PRESS: I've just heard from Ron, the previous owner, who has sent me the following breaking news...Now I've even more unsure what to call her...
'Forgot to tell you the boat has had a third name for the last 10years or so and that was "Kingfisher" named after a real kingfisher which was often seen on the boat when moored.'
I think you should name the boat whatever you want.
ReplyDeleteyou should definitely call it A Boat for my Potplants, but if you have had one too many or can't be bothered to annunciate you can call it a A Bo fo Ma Po
ReplyDelete